Glossary

Based on Appendix A of Michele Stefanelli’s book “Due Diligence of a Layer 2 – The Bitcoin Hyper Case”. 33 entries across 12 categories.

33 entries

Anchoring

Settlement

The periodic publication of the rollup’s state commitment to the Bitcoin base layer (L1). It provides immutability and a finality derived from Bitcoin’s security.

Ch. 11–12

OP_RETURN

Bitcoin L1

A Bitcoin script opcode that allows up to 80 bytes of arbitrary data to be embedded in a transaction, rendering it provably unspendable. Used to anchor state commitments.

Ch. 12

Taproot

Bitcoin L1

A Bitcoin upgrade (BIP 341/342, activated November 2021) that introduces Schnorr signatures and MAST. It improves the privacy, efficiency and flexibility of scripts, and is relevant to more efficient anchoring mechanisms.

Ch. 12

UTXO

Bitcoin L1

Unspent Transaction Output. Bitcoin’s accounting model: instead of “accounts”, there are “unspent coins” of specific amounts. This differs from the account model used by the SVM and Ethereum.

Ch. 1

Rollup

Layer 2

A Layer 2 solution that executes transactions off-chain and periodically publishes the compressed state to the base layer (L1). It combines off-chain scalability with security inherited from the L1.

Ch. 4–6

Sidechain

Layer 2

A separate blockchain connected to the L1 through a bridge. Unlike a rollup, it has its own independent security: if the sidechain fails, the risk is real and is not mitigated by the L1.

Ch. 4

Validium

Layer 2

An architecture similar to a rollup but with off-chain data availability (transaction data is not held on the L1). More scalable but less secure: if the data becomes unavailable, users cannot prove their balances.

Ch. 14

Optimistic Rollup

Layer 2

A rollup that assumes state transitions are valid by default (hence “optimistic”). It relies on fraud proofs to challenge incorrect transitions within a time window (typically seven days on Ethereum).

Ch. 6

ZK Rollup

Layer 2

A rollup that uses zero-knowledge cryptographic proofs to demonstrate mathematically the validity of every state transition. It offers immediate finality, but is computationally expensive.

Ch. 6

SVM (Solana Virtual Machine)

Execution

An execution runtime developed by Solana Labs. It enables parallel execution by requiring each transaction to declare explicitly the accounts it touches. Bitcoin Hyper uses it as its execution environment.

Ch. 7–8

Sealevel

Execution

The SVM’s parallelisation runtime. It analyses transactions in advance and executes them in parallel when they do not share accounts. It is the main source of the high throughput of Solana (and of Bitcoin Hyper).

Ch. 8

Anchor

Execution

A Rust framework for developing SVM programs. It adds macros, conventions and testing tools that considerably simplify writing smart contracts for Solana and Bitcoin Hyper.

Ch. 9

SPL (Solana Program Library)

Execution

A library of standard programs on the SVM: tokens (SPL Token), staking, governance and so on. Bitcoin Hyper aims for SPL compatibility, allowing Solana tokens and programs to be reused.

Ch. 9

Sequencer

Sequencing

The rollup component that orders transactions before execution. Whoever controls the sequencer can determine the ordering (with implications for MEV and censorship). At Bitcoin Hyper’s launch it is expected to be centralised.

Ch. 15–17

MEV (Maximal Extractable Value)

Sequencing

Value that can be extracted by reordering, inserting or omitting transactions within a block or batch. A centralised sequencer has full access to the rollup’s MEV.

Ch. 15

Forced Inclusion

Sequencing

A mechanism that lets users “force” the inclusion of a transaction through the Bitcoin L1, bypassing a censoring sequencer. Still under development in Bitcoin Hyper as at 28/04/2026.

Ch. 21

Canonical Bridge

Bridge

Bitcoin Hyper’s official bridge for moving BTC from the L1 to the rollup and back. At launch: federated/centralised custody. The roadmap envisages progressive decentralisation.

Ch. 31, 34

Forced Exit

Bridge

A mechanism that lets users withdraw funds from the rollup even when the sequencer or bridge is uncooperative, using the Bitcoin L1. A critical safety feature, still under development.

Ch. 21

Data Availability (DA)

Data Availability

The guarantee that the data for all transactions is publicly accessible. If the data is missing, no one can reconstruct the rollup’s state. A definitive solution is still under research in Bitcoin Hyper.

Ch. 14

State Commitment

Settlement

A compressed representation (typically a Merkle root) of the rollup’s complete state at a given moment. It is periodically published to Bitcoin for anchoring.

Ch. 11

Merkle Tree

Cryptography

A tree-shaped data structure in which each parent node is the hash of its children. It allows efficient proofs (Merkle proofs) of data inclusion without revealing the entire dataset.

App. A

$HYPER

Tokenomics

Bitcoin Hyper’s native token. Total supply: 21 billion (a nod to Bitcoin’s 21 million BTC). Used for transaction fees, staking and governance. Allocation: 25% Treasury, 30% Development, 20% Marketing, 15% Rewards, 10% Listings.

Ch. 30–33

Vesting

Tokenomics

A mechanism for releasing tokens gradually over time, in order to align the incentives of the team and investors with the project’s long-term success. The $HYPER presale has a seven-day vesting period.

Ch. 33

TGE (Token Generation Event)

Tokenomics

The event at which a token is initially created and distributed. According to the whitepaper, the security audits are to be completed before Bitcoin Hyper’s TGE.

Ch. 33

TVL (Total Value Locked)

DeFi

The total value of assets deposited in the DeFi protocols on a network. A metric used to gauge adoption of, and confidence in, an ecosystem.

App. A

AMM (Automated Market Maker)

DeFi

A DeFi protocol that uses mathematical formulas (typically x*y=k) to set exchange prices, removing the need for a traditional order book.

App. A

Oracle

DeFi

A service that brings real-world data (prices, events) onto the blockchain. Critical for DeFi: lending, derivatives and many contracts depend on reliable external prices.

App. A

Fraud Proof

Security

A cryptographic proof demonstrating that a state transition is invalid. Used in optimistic rollups to challenge fraudulent states within the challenge window.

Ch. 19

Security audit

Security

A review of the source code by a specialised third-party firm, with the aim of identifying vulnerabilities. For Bitcoin Hyper: promised before the TGE, but not yet published as at 28/04/2026.

Ch. 34

Finality

Settlement

The point after which a transaction can no longer be reversed. In Bitcoin Hyper, definitive finality is Bitcoin’s (after N blocks from anchoring).

Ch. 13

Lightning Network

Competitor

A Bitcoin Layer 2 based on payment channels. Optimised for fast, low-cost micropayments between two parties. It does not support complex smart contracts. In production since 2018.

Ch. 25–26

Stacks

Competitor

A Bitcoin Layer 2 that uses the PoX (Proof of Transfer) mechanism. It has its own smart-contract language (Clarity) and anchors its blocks to Bitcoin. Its ecosystem has remained limited relative to initial expectations.

Ch. 27

Rootstock (RSK)

Competitor

A Bitcoin sidechain with EVM compatibility and merge-mining. Live since 2018. A small ecosystem. It uses RBTC (pegged BTC) as gas.

Ch. 28